NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Alam v Rail Corporation New South Wales [2008] NSWDC 265 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 22, 23 October and 13, 21 November 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 26 November 2008
JURISDICTION: Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Gibson DCJ
(1) Judgment for the defendant. DECISION: (2) Plaintiff pay defendant's costs. (3) Liberty to apply, such liberty to be exercised within three months of the date of judgment. (4) Exhibits retained for 28 days.
CATCHWORDS: TORT - plaintiff caught in train doors attempting to enter train after warning signals - whether boarding train inherently dangerous - defendant not negligent - EVIDENCE - CCTV footage - whether admissible - whether evidentary value of limited or restricted nature
Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56 Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 5S and 15 LEGISLATION CITED: Civil Liability Legislation Amendment Act 2008 (NSW), Schs 1 and 2 Motor Accidents Act 1988 (NSW) Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), Ch 5 and s 128(3) Transport Administration Act 1988 (NSW), s 121
Allen v Tobias (1958) 98 CLR 367 Angel v Hawkesbury City Council [2008] NSWCA 130 Balasubramanian v Sara [1997] NSWCA 39 Beaton v McDivitt (1985) 13 NSWLR 134 BHP Pty Co Ltd v Mason and Anor (Supreme Court of South Australia, Debelle J, 7 November 1996, unreported) Blacktown City Council v Hocking (2008) Aust Torts Reports ¶81-956; [2008] NSWCA 144 Boyes v Collins (2000) 23 WAR 123; [2000] WASCA 344 Bridges v Pelley [2001] NSWCA 31 C Van der Lely NV v Bamfords Ltd [1963] RPC 61 Clark v New South Wales [2006] NSWSC 673 Dem Compagnie Pty Ltd v Telxon Australia [2004] NSWCA 66 Goodrich Aerospace Pty Ltd v Arsic [2006] NSWCA 187 Harrison v Melhem [2008] NSWCA 67 Hayes v Marquis [2008] NSWCA 10 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Joslyn v Berryman (2003) 214 CLR 552 CASES CITED: Mackenzie v Nominal Defendant [2005] NSWCA 180 Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 510 Morgan v Johnson (1998) 44 NSWLR 578 NSW Department of Housing v Hume [2007] NSWCA 69 People v Bowley 59 Cal 2d 855; 382 P 2d 591 (CA, 1963) Presidential Security Services of Australia Pty Ltd v Brilley (2008) 67 ACSR 692; [2008] NSWCA 204 R v Ames [1964-5] NSWR 1489 R v Lobendahn (1980) 5 Petty Sessions Review 2484 R v Travers (1958) 58 SR (NSW) 85 Schmidt v Schmidt [1969] QWN 3 Short v Barrett [1990] NSWCA 164 State v Pulphus 465 A 2d 153 (RI, 1983) Stillwell Trucks Pty Ltd v McKay & Ors [2002] NSWCA 292 Talbot-Butt v Holloway (1990) 12 MVR 70 Transfield Services (Australia) v Hall [2008] NSWCA 294 United States Shipping Board v The Ship St Albans [1931] AC 632 White v White [2004] NSWSC 208
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate