NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Sharma v QSR Pty Ltd t/as KFC Punchbowl (No 2)[ [2010] NSWADT 87
DIVISION: Equal Opportunity Division
APPLICANT J Sharma PARTIES: RESPONDENT QSR Pty Ltd t/as KFC Punchbowl
FILE NUMBER: 071102
HEARING DATES: On the papers
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 4 November 2009
DATE OF DECISION: 8 April 2010
BEFORE: Smyth M - Judicial Member; Hayes E - Non-Judicial Member;
CATCHWORDS: Costs - sexual harassment – sex discrimination –
Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 LEGISLATION CITED : Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Amendment Act 2008
Corrigan & Gibson v Watson [2009] NSWADT 110 Hughes v WA Cricket Assn (Inc) [1986] ATPR 48 CASES CITED: Jordan v North Coast Area Health Service (No 3) [2005] NSWADT 296 Salon Today Pty Limited v MMIR Pty Limited [2009] NSWADT 71 Sloey v State Transit [1999] NSWADT 40
APPLICANT P Elias, solicitor REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT J Murphy, barrister
ORDERS: Application is dismissed
REASONS FOR DECISION
1 In the substantive proceedings the applicant's complaint of sex discrimination and sexual harassment was substantiated in part - Sharma v QSR Pty Ltd t/as KFC Punchbowl [2009] NSWADT 166 . The applicant applied for costs under section 88 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 (ADT Act). Each party provided written submissions and the application has been determined on the papers in accordance with section 76 of the ADT Act.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate