NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Tanti Industries Pty Ltd v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales [2010] NSWADT 15
DIVISION: General Division
APPLICANT Tanti Industries Pty Ltd PARTIES: RESPONDENT WorkCover Authority of New South Wales
FILE NUMBER: 093231
HEARING DATES: 27 November 2009
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 30 November 2009
DATE OF DECISION: 15 January 2010
BEFORE: Montgomery S - Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Occupational Health and Safety Act - demolition licence - refusal to renew licence
Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 LEGISLATION CITED : Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 Occupational Health and Safety Regulation 2001
Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33; (1990) 170 CLR 321 CASES CITED: Hughes and Vale Pty Ltd v New South Wales (No. 2) [1955] HCA 28; (1955) 93 CLR 127 Sobey v Commercial and Private Agents Board 20 SASR 70 Obradovic v Commissioner for Fair Trading, Office of Fair Trading (GD) [2006] NSWADTAP 18
APPLICANT D Tanti, agent REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT L Welsch, barrister
ORDERS: The decision to refuse renewal of the Applicant's restricted demolition licence is affirmed.
REASONS FOR DECISION
1 This is an application by Tanti Industries Pty Ltd ("the Applicant") for review of a decision by a delegate of the Chief Executive of the WorkCover Authority of New South Wales ("WorkCover") to refuse renewal of the Applicant's restricted demolition licence.
2 The Applicant held a Restricted Demolition Licence that expired in November 2008. Mr David Tanti, the sole director of the Applicant, applied for renewal of that licence. That application for renewal was unsuccessful. WorkCover was not satisfied that Mr Tanti, as a director of the Applicant, is a fit and proper person to hold a Restricted Demolition Licence.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate