NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: R v KT [2009] NSWDC 224
15 June 2009 16 June 2009 HEARING DATE(S): 17 June 2009 20 July 2009 23 July 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 23 July 2009
JURISDICTION: Criminal
JUDGMENT OF: Bennett SC DCJ
DECISION: Grant a certificate pursuant to s 2 of the Costs in Criminals Cases Act 1967.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – costs – costs certificate
Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Procedure Act 1986
Mordaunt v Director of Public Prosecutions [2007] NSWCCA 121 R v Dunne (Unreported, Supreme Court of NSW, 17 May 1990) R v John Fejsa (1995) 82 A Crim R 253 CASES CITED: R v Hatfield [2001] NSWSC 334 R v McFarlane (Unreported, Supreme Court, 12 August 1994) R v Manley (2000) 49 NSWLR 203 R v Pavy (1997) 98 A Crim R 396 R v Prasad (1979) 23 SASR 161; 2 A Crim R 45
PARTIES: The Crown KT
FILE NUMBER(S): 2009 / 00005073
COUNSEL: Paul Hogan (For the Applicant)
SOLICITORS: Roger Kimbell (For the Crown)
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
2009/5073 BENNETT SC DCJ
Thursday 23 July 2009
R v KT
JUDGEMENT ON APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO THE COSTS IN CRIMINAL CASES ACT 1967, SECTION 2
Introduction
1 On 15 June 2009 the Applicant appeared for trial upon an indictment containing one count contrary to section 61I of the Crimes Act 1900. The offence charged is included in the definition of prescribed sexual offence in s 3 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986. Accordingly, the evidence of the complainant was presented in camera, and I made an order proscribing the publication of her name or any information that would allow her identification. In keeping with that course, I shall hereinafter refer to her by her initials or the term "complainant".
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate