NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: R v Brendan CUTMORE & R v Edward DAVIS [2009] NSWDC 261
HEARING DATE(S): 27 July 2009 - 29 July 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 29 July 2009
JURISDICTION: District Court Criminal
JUDGMENT OF: Sweeney DCJ
DECISION: Certificate granted
CATCHWORDS: Criminal law - Judgment - Costs - Evidence excluded under s 137 Evidence Act 1995 - No further proceedings directed by Director of Public Prosecutions - Application for certificate pursuant to Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967
LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act 1995 Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967
Chahal v Director of Public Prosecutions [2008] NSWCA 152 CASES CITED: KJF, unreported Supreme Court, 7 December 2007 R v Blick [2000] NSWCCA 61 R v Pavy (1997) 98 A Crim R 396
The Crown PARTIES: Brendan Cutmore Edward Davis
FILE NUMBER(S): DC 2009/11/0332; DC 2009/11/0333
Mr C Everson (Crown) COUNSEL: Ms S Kluss (Mr Cutmore) Ms L McSpedden (Mr Davis)
NSWDPP SOLICITORS: Sam Hegney Solicitors Armidale (Mr Cutmore) Jarratt Webb & Graham Advocacy Pty Ltd (Mr Davis)
JUDGMENT
1 HER HONOUR: On Monday 27 July 2009 Brendan Cutmore and Edward Davis were arraigned for the purpose of some preliminary legal arguments on an indictment containing four joint counts being aggravated break and enter with intent to steal, aggravated break enter and steal, attempt aggravated break and enter with intent to steal and be carried in a conveyance without the owner's consent. Mr Cutmore was also charged with an assault.
2 On Tuesday 28 July I excluded evidence of photographic identification of both accused pursuant to section 137 Evidence Act1995. The Director of Public Prosecutions thereafter directed that there be no further proceedings against both men.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate