NSW Caselaw
CITATION: LB v Hunter New England Area Health Service [2010] NSWADT 82
DIVISION: General Division
APPLICANT LB PARTIES: RESPONDENT Hunter New England Area Health Service
FILE NUMBER: 093058
HEARING DATES: 11 September 2009
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 16 November 2009
DATE OF DECISION: 31 March 2010
BEFORE: Higgins S - Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Privacy–health information–public sector agency-health privacy principle-collection and accuracy of health information-unsolicited health information
Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 LEGISLATION CITED : Freedom of Information Act 1989 Health Records and Information Privacy Act 2002 Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998
AW v Vice Chancellor, University of Newcastle [2008] NSWADT 86 LB v Hunter New England Area Health Service (No 2)[2009] NSWADT 132 CASES CITED: OA v New South Wales Department of Housing [2005] NSWADT 233 Vice-Chancellor, Macquarie University v FM (GD) [2003] NSWADTAP 43 ZR v NSW Dept of Education and Training [2008] NSWADT 199
APPLICANT In person REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT A Johnson, solicitor
ORDERS: Pursuant to subsection 55(2) of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 and for the reasons set out in these reasons for decision, the Tribunal has determined not to take any action in this matter.
REASONS FOR DECISION
Background
1 On 21 October 2008, LB made a written request to the respondent, the Hunter New England Health Service ('the HNEHS'), for access to his health information under the Health Records and Information Privacy Act 2002 ('HRIPA'). LB's application was in the following terms: 'This fax is my application under the above Act for the release of the following documents held by Hunter New England NSW Health.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate