NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: R v WHITBY [2010] NSWDC 119
15 June 2010 - 24 June 2010 HEARING DATE(S): 28 June 2010 30 June 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 1 July 2010
JURISDICTION: District Court Criminal
JUDGMENT OF: Berman SC DCJ
DECISION: I find the accused guilty on all 120 counts on the indictment.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - Judgment and Verdict - Judge only trial - Identification - Accused alleged to have videotaped child sexual assaults
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900
PARTIES: The Crown David Shane Whitby
FILE NUMBER(S): DC 2009/00160346
COUNSEL: M Tedeschi QC - Crown P Young SC with N Mikhaiel - Accused
SOLICITORS: Director of Public Prosecutions Legal Aid Commission
JUDGMENT
Introduction
1 On 15 June 2010 the accused David Shane Whitby was called for trial. He was arraigned on a lengthy indictment which contained 120 charges. He pleaded not guilty to each of those charges.
Trial by Judge Alone
2 Well before the day listed for the accused's trial he had elected for trial by judge alone. An election signed by the accused and containing consent by the Director of Public Prosecutions had been filed some time ago. I viewed that election and satisfied myself, through making enquiry of the accused, that he had received appropriate legal advice before choosing to have his trial heard by a judge rather than a jury.
The Charges
3 The charges faced by the accused can be conveniently grouped as follows:
4 Count one concerned an allegation of persistent sexual abuse of a child, that child being LW1. The evidence regarding that count primarily came from the complainant herself in oral evidence in court, although the Crown relied, if necessary, on tendency evidence as well.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate