NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Cleve Smith Excavations Pty Ltd v Hodgson [No 2] [2010] NSWDC 270
HEARING DATE(S): 5 November 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 3 December 2010
JURISDICTION: Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Levy SC DCJ
DECISION: 1. Judgment for the defendant cross claimant in the sum of $73.664.37; 2. See paragraph [34] for consequential orders.
CATCHWORDS: JUDGMENTS – calculation by parties of amount of final judgment including interest to reflect findings in primary judgment – application by a party to re-open judgment – whether indicated - PROCEDURE – set-off where claim and cross claim succeeded in differing amounts - COSTS – manner in which costs ought to be payable after set-off – whether indemnity costs indicated
LEGISLATION CITED: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98(4)(b)Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 76A(1)(b); s 122(b)(ii)Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 36.16(1)
Cleve Smith Excavations Pty Ltd v Hodgson [2009] NSWDC 232 CASES CITED: Smith v NSW Bar Association [1992] HCA 36; (1992) 176 CLR 256 Texas Co (Australasia) Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1940] HCA 9; (1940) 63 CLR 382
PARTIES: Cleve Smith Excavations Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Martin Robert Hodgson (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S): 1493 of 2009; 2009/334526
COUNSEL: Mr J Lazarus (Plaintiff) Mr P Menadue (Defendant)
SOLICITORS: Conditsis & Associates (Plaintiff) Brennan Tipple Partners (Defendant)
JUDGMENT
Background
1. On 15 October 2010, primary findings and reasons for judgment were delivered in these proceedings. A verdict was entered in favour of the plaintiff, Cleve Smith Excavations Pty Ltd, with damages assessed in the sum of $108,148.76. On the defendant's cross claim against the plaintiff, a verdict was entered in favour of the defendant/cross claimant, Mr Hodgson, with damages assessed in the sum of $126,743. These amounts excluded pre-judgment interest : Cleve Smith Excavations Pty Ltd v Hodgson [2009] NSWDC 232.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate