NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Foilmakers Australia Pty Ltd v Everett Worthington (Aust) Pty Ltd [2008] NSWDC 85 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 4, 5, 6 and 7 February 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 18 April 2008
JURISDICTION: Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Gibson DCJ
(1) Judgment for the plaintiff for $207,125.22. DECISION: (2) Defendant pay plaintiff's costs. (3) Liberty to restore concerning interests and costs. (4) Exhibits retained for 28 days.
CATCHWORDS: CONTRACT - supply of goods - conflicting evidence of plaintiff's and defendant's witnesses - reliance on objective evidence to determine disputed issues of fact
TEXTS CITED: Justice David Ipp, "Problems with Fact-finding" (2 September 2006) Lawlink, Supreme Court of New South Wales <http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lawlink/Supreme_Court/ll_sc.nsf/pages/SCO_ipp020906>
PARTIES: Plaintiff: Foilmakers Australia Pty Ltd Defendant: Everett Worthington (Aust) Pty Ltd
FILE NUMBER(S): 6132 of 2006
COUNSEL: Plaintiff: S Sirtes Defendant: P Newton
SOLICITORS: Plaintiff: Andreones Pty Limited Defendant: Kemp Strang Lawyers
Introduction
1. The plaintiff by way of Statement of Liquidated Claim seeks $188,444.38, being $170,058.24 plus interest for the period 14 November 2005 until 15 December 2006 and interest thereafter at the rate of $41.93 per day, for payment for goods the plaintiff alleges it ordered on behalf of the defendant. The disputed issue of fact fall within a narrow compass and both parties contend that no legal issues arise. The question is whether I accept the evidence of the plaintiff's witnesses or the defendant's witnesses as to the contents of the contract.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate