NSW Caselaw
Appeal Panel - Internal
CITATION: Chi v Technical and Further Education Commission (EOD) [2010] NSWADTAP 67
APPELLANT Johny Chi PARTIES: RESPONDENT Technical and Further Education Commission
FILE NUMBER: 099073
HEARING DATES: 31 May 2010
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 31 May 2010
DATE OF DECISION: 11 October 2010
BEFORE: Patten D - Deputy President; Huntsman C - Judicial Member; Hiffernan N - Non-Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Alleged Victimisation – not established – whether detriment proved
DECISION UNDER APPEAL: Chi v Technical and Further Education Commission (No 3) [2009] NSWADT 271
FILE NUMBER UNDER APPEAL: 061089
LEGISLATION CITED : Anti Discrimination Act 1997 Technical and Further Education Commission Act 1990
Nicholls and anor v Director-General Department of Education and Training (No 2) (2009) NSW ADTAP 20 Shaikh v Commissioner of NSW Fire Brigades (1996) EOC 92-808 Purvis v NSW (2003) 217 CLR 92 CASES CITED: Ewsdale v the Queen [2000] 202 CLR 321 Sivananthan v Commissioner of Police [2001] NSWADT 44 Building Professionals Board v Harm (GD) [2008] NSW ADTAP13 K v K [2002] NSWSC 1052
APPELLANT J Darams - Counsel REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT P Ginters – Counsel
1. Appeal dismissed ORDERS: 2. Orders made by the Tribunal confirmed 3. Leave to extend appeal to hearing on merits refused 4. No order as to costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate