NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Project Architecture Pty Limited v Peter's of Kensington Pty Limited [2008] NSWDC 24
HEARING DATE(S): 14 February 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 5 March 2008
JURISDICTION: Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Rolfe DCJ
DECISION: See paragraph 22 of Judgment
CATCHWORDS: Claim under Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 - Application for Summary Judgment - Relevant principles - Whether triable issue of fact or law had been disclosed - Whether party raising triable issue of fact required to cross-examine opposing party
LEGISLATION CITED: Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999
General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 Dey v Victorian Railway Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62 CASES CITED: Sidebottom v Cureton (1937) 54 WN (NSW) 88 Cloverdell Lumber Co Pty Ltd v Abbott (1924) 34 CLR 122 at 133 Seymour v Australian Broadcasting Commission (1990) 19 NSWLR 219 at 224-225 Stern v National Australia Bank Limited (2001) 171 ALR 192
PARTIES: Project Architecture Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Peter's of Kensington Pty Limited ( Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S): 4142/07
COUNSEL: I G Roberts (Plaintiff) F Corsaro SC with D W Rayment (Defendant)
JUDGMENT
1 The plaintiff, Project Architecture Pty Limited, provides architectural services. The defendant, Peter's of Kensington Pty Limited, owns and operates the retail shop known as "Peter's of Kensington" at 57 Anzac Parade Kensington (the "Shop").
2 The plaintiff commenced these proceedings when it filed its Statement of Claim on 19 September 2007. An Amended Statement of Claim was filed in Court on 14 February 2008.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate