NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION : Workcover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Mansell) v Hayman Industries Pty Ltd [2003] NSWIRComm 154 PROSECUTOR: Inspector Mansell PARTIES : DEFENDANT: Hayman Industries Pty Ltd FILE NUMBER: IRC 3375 of 2002 CORAM: Staunton J CATCHWORDS : Occupational health and safety - plea of guilty - failure to adequately maintain press - dispute taken by defendant over causal factor identified in agreed facts - conflicting evidence of like probability not established - objective seriousness of offence - general and specific deterrance - financial circumstances of the defendant - erosion of utilitarian value of early plea- prior conviction of similar type but differing factual background - penalty imposed LEGISLATION CITED : Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983 Nesmat Pty Ltd v Workcover Authority of New South Wales [1998] 87 IR 312 Camilleri's Stockfeeds Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority [1993] 32 NSWLR 683 CASES CITED : Lawrenson Diecasting v Workcover 90 IR 464 Capral Aluminium Ltd v Workcover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Mayo Ramsay) [2000] 49 NSWLR 610 Benbow v Converquip Pty Ltd [2001] 106 IR 258 HEARING DATES: 02/28/2002; 04/03/2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/19/2003
PROSECUTOR: Mr Docking of counsel SOLICITORS: Phillips Fox (Gordon Henderson) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: DEFENDANT: Mr Mario Quintiliani of counsel SOLICITORS: Kells the Lawyers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate