NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Doyle v Kempsey Workpool [2005] NSWIRComm 1029
APPLICANT: Ms. G. Doyle PARTIES: RESPONDENT: Kempsey Workpool Inc.
FILE NUMBER(S): 5296 of 2004
CORAM: Ritchie C
Application for unfair dismissal Application for reinstatement Applicant terminated for misconduct Claim applicant struck fellow worker and applicant failed to complete an incident report CATCHWORDS: Investigation by respondent unsatisfactory Applicant misled by respondent's documents Applicant stated that action part of a demonstration, no malice involved Applicant did not think of completing a form as client advised -okay Found that termination was harsh, ,unreasonable ,unjust. Order to reinstate with backpay.
Industrial Relations Act LEGISLATION CITED: 1996
HEARING DATES: 02/14/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/10/2005
Applicant: Ms. G. Doyle LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Respondent: Ms. B. Pimm of Jobs Australia Ltd
DECISION: INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: RITCHIE C 10 March 2005
Matter No IRC 5296 of 2004
IN THE MATTER OF : Geraldine Antonia Doyle and Kempsey Workpool Inc.
Application by Geraldine Antonia Doyle re unfair dismissal pursuant to section 84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996.
DECISION
[2005] NSWIRComm 1029
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate