NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION : Chiodo v Hobbs Bros (Carriers) Pty Ltd [2000] NSWIRComm 166 APPLICANT Antonio Chiodo PARTIES : RESPONDENT Hobbs Bros (Carriers) Pty Limited & anor FILE NUMBER: IRC 3293 of 1999 CORAM: Glynn J CATCHWORDS : Unfair contract - transport industry - subcontractor - alleged misrepresentation as to annual earnings - long term social/business relationship between parties - held that misrepresentation not made out - application dismissed. LEGISLATION CITED : Industrial Relations Act 1996 s 105 s 106 A & M Thompson Pty Ltd v Total Australia Ltd 1980 AR 399 CASES CITED : Davies v General Transport Development Pty Ltd 1967 AR 371 Leda Holdings Pty Limited v Oraka Pty Limited (FCA, Beaumont, Branson and Emmett JJ, NG320 of 1997, 9/12/97) HEARING DATES: 04/10/2000; 04/11/2000; 05/16/2000 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/24/2000
APPLICANT Mr I Sanderson of counsel SOLICITORS Mr A J Rollins Crichton-Brownes LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr J Higgins of counsel Mr M Baroni New South Wales Road Transport Association Inc
JUDGMENT: - 15 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES IN COURT SESSION CORAM: GLYNN J
24 AUGUST 2000
MATTER NO IRC3293 OF 1999
ANTONIO CHIODO v HOBBS BROS (CARRIERS) PTY LIMITED & ANOR Application under s 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate