NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION: Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union, New South Wales Branch v Alan Thomas David and others [2005] NSWIRComm 428
APPLICANT Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union, New South Wales Branch
FIRST RESPONDENT PARTIES: Alan Thomas David
SECOND RESPONDENT John Lawrence Coates
FILE NUMBER(S): 2950 of 2004
CORAM: Marks J
Section 106 - interlocutory application - strike-out motion - whether case is untenable - application of Brown v Rezitis principles - applicant's case against second respondent dismissed - costs. CATCHWORDS: Section 106 - interlocutory application - joinder application for additional respondent - notice of motion not amended - application of Brown v Rezitis principles - sale of first respondent to potential joined respondent - whether case is untenable - joinder application refused - costs.
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
Ace Business Brokers Pty Ltd v Phillips-Treby [2000] NSWIRComm 163 Brown v Rezitis (1970) 127 CLR 157 CASES CITED: General Steel Industries v Commissioner for Railways NSW (1964) 112 CLR 125 Mestrom v Alison Clint Floral Delivery Pty Ltd (No2) (1971) 71 AR (NSW) 216 Virtue v New South Wales Department of Education and Training (1999) 92 IR 428
HEARING DATES: 11/16/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/30/2005
APPLICANT Mr I Latham of counsel Solicitor: Mr S Penning Turner Freeman Lawyers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate