NSW Caselaw
Dust Diseases Tribunal of New South Wales
CITATION : (Re Mowbray) Brambles Holdings Ltd v British American Tobacco Australia Services Ltd (No 6) [2006] NSWDDT 7 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
PARTIES : Brambles Holdings Ltd British American Tobacco Australia Services Ltd
MATTER NUMBER(S) : 176/01/1
JUDGMENT OF: Curtis J at 1
CATCHWORDS: Dust Diseases Tribunal :-
LEGISLATION CITED: s25B Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989 s5(1)(c) Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946
Tame v New South Wales (2002) 211 CLR 317 ; Bankstown Foundry Pty Ltd v Braistina (1985-1986) 160 CLR 301; Maclean v Tedman (1985) 155 CLR 314; Rooney v Babcock Australia Pty Ltd [2004] NSWDDT 53; McDonald v State Rail Authority (1998) 16 NSWCCR 695 ; CASES CITED: Eaton v Carrier Air Conditioning Proprietary Limited (unreported DDT 84 of 2003 3 September 2004); Bendix Mintex Pty Ltd v Barnes (1997) 42NSWLR 307 ; McPherson's Ltd v Eaton (2005) NSWCA 43; CSR Ltd v Wren (1997) 44 NSWLR 463 ; Raif v SG Sayer Pty Limited (1996) 13 NSWCCR 393 ; Judd v Amaca Limited (No.2) 25 NSWCCR 488
DATES OF HEARING: 24 March 2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/31/2006
Mr GM Watson SC and Mr C Mantziaris instructed by Corrs Chambers Westgarth appeared for British American Tobacco Australia Services Limited, Applicant on the Motion LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate