NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION: Darc Rasmussen v Eltrax Systems Pty Ltd (Formerly Sulcus (Australia) Pty Ltd) and Others [2005] NSWIRComm 227
Applicant Darc Rasmussen
First Respondent Eltrax Systems Pty Ltd (Formerly Sulcus (Australia) Pty Ltd) (ACN: 053 993 025)
Second Respondent Christopher Ian Gribble
PARTIES: Third Respondent Jo-Ann Schlein
Fourth Respondent John Picardi
Fifth Respondent Verso Technologies Inc (Formerly Eltrax Systems Inc)
FILE NUMBER(S): 4276 of 2001
CORAM: Backman J
CATCHWORDS: Unfair contract - interlocutory proceedings - Notice of Motion - applicant seeking leave to file Second Amended Summons for Relief - whether Notice of Motion annexing Second Amended Summons served on fifth respondent - application by applicant seeking leave to serve Second Amended Summons - applicable rules in relation to service of Notice of Motion on a foreign corporate respondent - whether applicant effected service of Notice of Motion in accordance with the Rules - principles in relation to leave to file Second Amended Summons - leave granted to file Second Amended Summons within seven days - leave granted to serve the Second Amended Summons on the first to fifth respondents by 4.00pm on 2 August, 2005 - costs reserved.
Industrial Relations Commissions Rules 1996 LEGISLATION CITED: Supreme Court Rules
ASIC v Sweeney (No 2) 38 ASCR 743 Castagna & Anor v Conceria Pell Mec SpA (unreported, Court of Appeal (FC) NSW No. 40561 of 1992, 15 March 1995). Darc Rasmussen v Eltrax Systems Pty Ltd (Formerly Sulcus (Australia) Pty Ltd) and Others [2003] NSWIRComm 157 Darc Rasmussen v Eltrax Systems Pty Ltd [2004] NSWIRComm 307 CASES CITED: Laurie v Carroll (1958) 98 CLR 310 Reich v Client Service Professionals of Australia Pty Ltd (2000) 49 NSWLR 551 Sydney Water Corporation Ltd & Anor v Industrial Relations Commission of NSW & Anor [2004] NSWCA 436 Verso Technologies Inc (formerly Eltrax Systems Inc) v Rasmussen (2004) 135 IR 147
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate