NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION : Hallford Pty Ltd v Caltex Petroleum Pty Ltd [2000] NSWIRComm 81 APPLICANT Hallford Pty Ltd PARTIES : DEFENDANT Caltex Petroleum Pty Ltd FILE NUMBER: IRC311 of 1197 CORAM: Marks J CATCHWORDS : Security for costs LEGISLATION CITED : Industrial Relations Act 1996 s 106 Corporations Law s 1335 Buckley v Bennell Design & Constructions Pty Ltd (1974) 1 ACTR 301 at 303 Interwest Ltd v Tricontinental Corp Ltd (1991) 5 ACSR 621 at 624 CASES CITED : Sydmar Pty Ltd v Statewise Developments Pty Ltd (1987) 5 ACLC 480 at 484 Pearson v Naydler (1977) 1 WLR 899 Parkinson v Triplan (1973) 2 All ER 273 at 285 HEARING DATES: 05/16/2000 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/22/2000
APPLICANT (Respondent to the Notion of Motion) Mr D M Bernie of counsel SOLICITORS Williams - The Law Firm
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT (Applicant in the Notice of Motion) Mr A R Moses of counsel SOLICITORS Ernst & Young Law
JUDGMENT:
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS OF NEW SOUTH WALES IN COURT SESSION
CORAM: MARKS J
Monday, 22 May 2000
Matter No IRC 311 of 1997 HALLFORD PTY LTD v CALTEX PETROLEUM PTY LTD Application under s106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996
INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT ON SECURITY FOR COSTS APPLICATION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate