NSW Caselaw
Dust Diseases Tribunal of New South Wales
CITATION : Stavar v Caltex Refineries (Qld)Pty Ltd No 4 [2008] NSWDDT 28
Beverley Dawn Stavar (Plaintiff) Caltex Refineries (Qld) Pty Ltd (First Defendant) PARTIES : Amaca Pty Limited (Second Defendant) Wallaby Grip Limited (Third Defendant) Wallaby Grip (BAE) Pty Limited (Fourth Defendant) Wallaby Grip (NSW) Pty Limited (Fifth Defendant)
MATTER NUMBER(S) : 7349 of 2007
JUDGMENT OF: O'Meally P
CATCHWORDS: DUST DISEASES TRIBUNAL :- Costs - Contributions determination - Offer by one defendant to contribute determined proportion - Whether defendant entitled to costs from other defendants
LEGISLATION CITED: Dust Diseases Tribunal Regulation 2007 Uniform Civil Proceedure Rules
CASES CITED: Calderbank v Calderbank 1975 3 All ER 333
DATES OF HEARING: 1 October 2008
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 1 October 2008
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 1 October 2008
No appearance for the Plaintiff
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: G J Parker instructed by HWL Ebsworth appeared for the First Defendant J C Sheller instructed by DLA Phillips Fox appeared for the Second Defendant D J Russell SC instructed by Middletons appeared for the Third, Fourth and Fifth Defendants
JUDGMENT:
RULING O'MEALLY P 1. Mr Sheller on behalf of Amaca Pty Ltd (Amaca) seeks an order that the first defendant Caltex Refineries (Qld) Pty Ltd (Caltex) and the third, fourth and fifth defendants (the Wallaby Grip companies) and CSR Ltd (CSR) one of two cross-defendants in these proceedings (though the only cross-defendant to Mr Sheller's cross-claim), pay its costs of defending the plaintiff's proceedings. Earlier, Caltex unsuccessfully applied for an order that the second, third and fourth defendants pay its costs on the issues on which it successfully resisted the plaintiff's application for costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate