NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION: East Coast Brokers Pty Limited v The Commonwealth of Australia (Department of Defence) and another [2005] NSWIRComm 371
APPLICANT/ RESPONDENT ON MOTION East Coast Brokers Pty Limited
FIRST RESPONDENT/ APPLICANT ON MOTION The Commonwealth of Australia (Department of Defence) PARTIES: SECOND RESPONDENT Serco Sodexho Defence Service Pty Limited
INTERVENOR Attorney General for New South Wales
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 921 of 2004
CORAM: Wright J President; Walton J Vice-President; Boland J; Staff J
Unfair contract - Interlocutory proceedings - Notice of motion - Reference - Jurisdiction - Section 109 of Commonwealth Constitution - Inconsistency of laws - Contractor removed from performing work in a Defence establishment - Whether inconsistency between s 106 of Industrial Relations Act 1996 and s 9A of Defence Act 1903 (Cth) - Whether inconsistency between s 106 of Industrial Relations Act 1996 and Occupational Health and Safety (Commonwealth Employment) Act 1991 (Cth) - Whether inconsistency between s 106 of Industrial Relations Act 1996 or proposed orders under that section and a Defence Instruction issued under the Defence Act - Operational inconsistency - Whether Commonwealth laws are the source of power empowering Commonwealth to affect legal rights of applicant in substantive proceedings - Whether any constitutional inconsistency exists in light of extant contract determining rights and obligations of parties - Notice of motion dismissed - Costs
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate