NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION : Blanket and anor v Telstra Corporation Limited [2004] NSWIRComm 161 FIRST APPLICANT Paul Blanket
PARTIES : SECOND APPLICANT The Blanket Partnership
RESPONDENT Telstra Corporation Limited FILE NUMBER: 7508 of 2001 CORAM: Marks J CATCHWORDS : Interlocutory application for costs - alleged unfair employment arrangement - discovery of documents - competing submissions of parties as to costs - principles relating to discovery process considered - common law test of relevance applied - attitude of legal practitioners impeded consensus - duties of legal practitioners breached - proceedings adjourned for further submissions to show cause why legal costs should not be borne by legal practitoners Industrial Relations Act 1996 s 106 Industrial Relations Commission Rules 1996 ss 160 162 163 LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court of New South Wales Rules
Century Medical Inc v THLD Limited (No 3) [2000] NSWSC 428 E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co v Commissioner of Patents (1987) 16 FCR 423 at 424 Ferguson v MacKaness Produce Pty Ltd [1979] 2 NSWR 66 CASES CITED : Glover Gibbs Pty Ltd trading as Balfours New South Wales Pty Ltd v Laybutt [2004] NSWCA 45 Mulley v Manifold (1959) 103 CLR 341 at 345 National Australia Bank Ltd v Idoport Pty Ltd [2000] NSWCA 8 Woods v Martin Bank Limited [1958] 1 WLR HEARING DATES: 06/01/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/28/2004
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate