NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION : Scanruby v Caltex [2001] NSWIRComm 172 APPLICANT Scanruby Pty Limited
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT Caltex Petroleum Pty Limited
SECOND RESPONDENT Caltex Australia Petroleum Pty Limited FILE NUMBER: IRC3347 of 1998 CORAM: Peterson J CATCHWORDS : Costs - application to displace general rule on costs in favour of the unsuccessful applicant - submission that proceedings would not have been taken if not for the activity of the respondents - no representation in terms which would cause the conduct of respondent to be held against it - no element to warrant an order in favour of the applicant on costs - order that applicant pay respondents' costs - order stayed pending appeal. LEGISLATION CITED : Industrial Relations Act 1996 Industrial Relations Commission Rules 1996 Ritter v Godfrey [1920] 2 KB 47 at 53 per Lord Sterndale, MR CASES CITED : Donald Campbell & Co Ltd v Pollak [1927] AC 732 Cretazzo v Lombardi (1975) 13 SASR 9 at 11 per Bray J Verna Trading Pty Ltd v New India Assurance Co Ltd [1991] 1 VR 129 HEARING DATES: 04/27/2001 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/03/2001
Mr S R Coleman of counsel
SOLICITOR Mr T J Williams Williams The Law Firm PETERSHAM.
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr D E J Ryan SC
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate