NSW Caselaw
Dust Diseases Tribunal of New South Wales
CITATION : Smart v State of NSW [2008] NSWDDT 20
PARTIES : James Joseph Smart (Plaintiff) State of New South Wales (Defendant)
MATTER NUMBER(S) : 7308 of 2007
JUDGMENT OF: O'Meally P
CATCHWORDS: DUST DISEASES TRIBUNAL :- Assessment of damages
LEGISLATION CITED: Civil Liability Act 2002
CASES CITED: Novek v Amaca Pty Ltd [2008] NSWDDT 12
DATES OF HEARING: 15, 16 July 2008
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 16 July 2008
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 16 July 2008
J A McIntyre SC instructed by Turner Freeman appeared for the Plaintiff LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: T Moisidis instructed by Hicksons Lawyers appeared for the Defendant
JUDGMENT:
JUDGMENT O'MEALLY P 1. James Joseph Smart suffers from malignant pleural mesothelioma which he contracted as a result of exposure to asbestos in the course of his employment by the New South Wales Government Railways. The State of New South Wales has assumed the liability of the railways and it concedes that the plaintiff is entitled to damages. My only task is to assess general and special damages.
2. Mesothelioma is a terrible, devastating and exquisitely painful disorder. With the effluxion of time and in the light of experience, general damages are often agreed. Of recent times, judges of the Tribunal have tended not to recite the horrible and excruciating pain suffered by those who contract the disease and counsel rarely address this issue in submissions.
3. Painkilling medication often is inadequate to deal with the pain; often, at best, it plateaus pain rather than remove it. People who suffer mesothelioma reach a stage where they experience constant and uncontrolled pain. Every breath induces increased pain and a sufferer is left with a choice between breathing and not breathing, which, of course, is no choice at all.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate