NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION : Little v Commissioner of Police [2001] NSWIRComm 9 APPLICANT Geoffrey Bernard William Little PARTIES : RESPONDENT Commissioner of Police FILE NUMBER: IRC256 of 2000 CORAM: Peterson J CATCHWORDS : Order for removal of police officer - reliance on conduct, performance and integrity - problems of supervision, relationships with female police officers and other supervisors - conflict in evidence in the proceedings - effect of - case not established that removal harsh, unreasonable or unjust - application dismissed. LEGISLATION CITED : Police Service Act 1990 ss181E 181D and 181F Industrial Relations Act 1996 s84 HEARING DATES: 10/03/2000; 10/04/2000; 10/05/2000; 10/06/2000; 10/10/2000; 10/11/2000; 10/19/2000; 10/26/2000 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/08/2001
APPLICANT Mr A Hatcher of counsel
SOLICITOR Jones Staff & Co SYDNEY
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr J J Graves SC, with him Mr G J Willis of counsel
SOLICITOR Court and Legal Services NSW Police Service SYDNEY.
JUDGMENT: - 1 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: PETERSON J
DATE: 8 MARCH 2001
Matter No. IRC256 of 2000
GEOFFREY BERNARD WILLIAM LITTLE and COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
Application by Geoffrey Bernard William Little for review of order made under s181D of the Police Service Act 1990. DECISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate