NSW Caselaw
Dust Diseases Tribunal of New South Wales
CITATION : Karteris v Omonoia Constructions & Ors [2009] NSWDDT 19
Lambros Karteris Stelios Hatzisarantinos, James Katakouzinos and James Katsianis trading as Omonoia Constructions PARTIES : CGU Insurance Limited GIO General Limited Mercantile Mutual Insurance (Workers' Compensation) Limited WorkCover Authority of New South Wales
MATTER NUMBER(S) : 7093 of 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Kearns J
CATCHWORDS: DUST DISEASES TRIBUNAL :- Costs
LEGISLATION CITED: Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989
CASES CITED: Harris v Commercial Minerals Limited DDT30/91, [1999] NSWCA 94 Apostolopoulos v Hatzisarantinos & Ors t/a Omonoia Constructions [2008] NSWDDT 33
DATES OF HEARING: 22 June 2009
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23 July 2009
Mr P Semmler QC with Mr S Tzouganatos instructed by Turner Freeman appeared for the plaintiff LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr J Sharpe instructed by Thompson Cooper Lawyers appeared for the first defendant. Mr J Sharpe appeared on behalf of the other defendants.
JUDGMENT:
1. On 11 January 2008, the plaintiff filed a notice under s25B of the Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989. Relevantly, he relied on determinations by Johns J in Harris v Commercial Minerals Limited DDT30/91 and by the Court of Appeal in its decision on appeal [1999] NSWCA 94. On 2 June 2008, the first defendant filed a notice of motion seeking leave to re-litigate and re-argue the determinations relied on by the plaintiff. In addition to seeking leave to re-litigate the determinations relied on by the plaintiff, it also sought orders or rulings that the determinations were not in relation to issues of a general nature within the meaning of the section.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate