NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION : Bourot v New South Wales Department of Public Works and Services & Anor (No 2) [2002] NSWIRComm 201 revised - 05/12/2003 APPLICANT Pascale Bourot
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT New South Wales Department of Public Works and Services SECOND RESPONDENT Central Sydney Area Health Service FILE NUMBER: IRC 5810 of 2000 CORAM: Marks J CATCHWORDS : Costs of interlocutory proceedings - Held that the Protected Disclosures Act and s405 of the Industrial Relations Act not relevant to exercise of discretion to award costs - Application for summary judgment on admissions - Held inappropriate where substantial questions of fact or law to be determined notwithstanding admissions made and inappropriate where exercise of court's jurisdiction is discretionary. Industrial Relations Act 1996 s154 s405 Industrial Relations Commission Rules r155 LEGISLATION CITED : Protected Disclosures Act GREAT Act Public Service Management Act 1988 Crewdson v NSW Department of Community Services & Anor (No 3) [2002] NSWIRComm 139 CASES CITED : Termitjelen v Van Arkel (1974) 1 NSWLR 525 Porrett v White (1885) 31 ChD 52 Lancashire Welders Ltd v Harland & Wolff, Ltd (1950) 2 All ER 1096 HEARING DATES: 07/23/2002; 07/24/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/22/2002
AGENT REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT Mr Gerard Crewdson
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate