NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION : Burnett v Atlantis Relocations (NSW) Pty Ltd [2002] NSWIRComm 266 APPLICANT Nicholas Burnett
FIRST RESPONDENT Atlantis Relocations (NSW) Pty Ltd PARTIES : SECOND RESPONDENT Anthony John Jaggs THIRD RESPONDENT John Macri FOURTH RESPONDENT Atlantis = Pty Ltd FILE NUMBER: IRC 3971 of 2001 CORAM: Marks J CATCHWORDS : Application to amend proceedings by adding additional respondents - Proposed additional respondent submitted that proceedings against it were futile - Held proper approach was to consider the matter as if new proceedings were being issued, and when was the "appropriate" time to consider whether the proceedings were futile - Held not appropriate to consider such a matter without any evidence being filed - Summons amended by adding further respondents. LEGISLATION CITED : Industrial Relations Act 1996 s 106 Brown v Rezitis (1970) 127 CLR 157 Ace Business Brokers Pty Ltd v Phillips-Treby (2000) NSWIRComm 163 Gough & Gilmour Holdings Py Ltd v Caterpillar of Australia Ltd (2001) NSWIRComm 92 Harmer v Caltex Petroleum Pty Ltd (2000) NSWIRComm 100 CASES CITED : Bowker v Software Engineers Australia (NSW) Pty Ltd (2002) NSWIRComm 135 North v Consolidated Gaming Corporation Ltd (2000) NSWIRComm 258 Horton v Jones (No 2) (1939) 39 SR (NSW) 305 James v Talisman Group Pty Ltd (2001) NSWIRComm 199 Euphoric Pty Ltd v Ryledar Pty Ltd (2002) NSWIRComm 136 HEARING DATES: 08/08/2002; 09/05/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/17/2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate