NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION: Rodney Morrison v Eureka Opals Pty Limited [2005] NSWIRComm 437
APPELLANT Rodney Dale Morrison PARTIES: RESPONDENT Eureka Opals Pty Limited
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 1737 of 2005
CORAM: Wright J President; Walton J Vice-President; Boland J
Appeal - Leave to appeal - Occupational health and safety - Section 17(1)(a) of Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983 - Respondent was owner of opal mining Claim - Person injured by roof fall - Whether Claim was "non-domestic premises" within the meaning of the Act - Whether Claim made available to persons not employed by the respondent - Whether Claim made available as a place of work - Whether respondent had, to any extent, control of the Claim - Whether respondent failed to ensure Claim and the means of access thereto or egress therefrom were safe and without risk to health - Defences under s 53 of Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983 - Legal and factual errors found to have occurred at first instance - Appeal upheld CATCHWORDS: Occupational health and safety - Appeal - Section 17(1)(a) of Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983 - Respondent was owner of opal mining Claim - Person injured by roof fall - Whether Claim was "non-domestic premises" within the meaning of the Act - Whether Claim made available to persons not employed by the respondent - Whether Claim made available as a place of work - Whether respondent had, to any extent, control of the Claim - Whether respondent failed to ensure Claim and the means of access thereto or egress therefrom were safe and without risk to health - Defences under s 53 of Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983 - Legal and factual errors found to have occurred at first instance - Appeal upheld
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate