NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION : Yatras and another v Moraitis Administration (NSW) Pty Ltd and others [2004] NSWIRComm 391 APPLICANTS/RESPONDENTS ON MOTION Dianne Yatras and Anthony Yatras
PARTIES : RESPONDENTS/APPLICANTS ON MOTION Moraitis Administration (NSW) Pty Limited (First Respondent) Nicholas Moraitis (Second Respondent) Moraitis Fresh Packaging (NSW) Pty Limited (Third Respondent) FILE NUMBER: IRC 7315 of 2003 CORAM: Staff J CATCHWORDS : Unfair contract - Interlocutory application - Notice of motion seeking dismissal of summons under s 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 - Application of s 108B of Industrial Relations Act 1996 - S 108B applied to summons for relief - Summons dismissed Practice and procedure - Interlocutory application - Notice of motion seeking dismissal of summons under s 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 - Application of s 108B of Industrial Relations Act 1996 - S 108B applied to summons for relief - Summons dismissed Industrial Relations Act 1996 LEGISLATION CITED : Industrial Relations Amendment (Unfair Contracts) Act 2002 Interpretation Act 1987 Attorney-General for the State of Queensland v Australian Industrial Relations Commission, Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations (C'th) v Australian Industrial Relations Commission (2002) 213 CLR 485 Aveling v UBS Capital Markets Australia Holdings Ltd [2004] NSWIRComm 261 Commander Australia Limited v Kerr (2004) 134 IR 160 Crowe v UCS Developments Pty Ltd, (2003) 130 IR 266Kennedy v Contract Transport Solutions Pty Ltd [2003] NSWIRComm 158 CASES CITED : Larsen v Ondeo Nalco Australia Pty Ltd [2004] NSWIRComm 123 Majik Markets Pty Ltd v Brake and Service Centre Drummoyne Pty Ltd & Ors (1991) 28 NSWLR 443, 39 IR 169 Maxwell v Murphy (1957) 96 CLR 261 Nagle (T/as W D & J L Nagle & Sons) v Tilburg & Anor (1993) 51 IR 8 Virtue v New South Wales Department of Education and Training (1999) 92 IR 428 Youry Dawidar v One Steel Wire Pty Ltd and another [2004] NSWIRComm 372 HEARING DATES: 12/01/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/16/2004
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate