NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Temesvari and Divine Image Group Pty Limited [2005] NSWIRComm 1060
APPLICANT Alex George Temesvari PARTIES: RESPONDENT Divine Image Group Pty Limited
FILE NUMBER(S): 3860 of 2004
CORAM: Murphy C
CATCHWORDS: Unfair Dismissal of casual promotions officer in wine industry - jurisdictional questions of late application and short term casual employment found in favour of applicant - Evidence of applicant preferred over respondent - applicant found to have been dismissed for refusal to work additional shift on day of already rostered shift - Commission did not accept hirings came to end because of completion of the particular promotion - absence of procedural fairness and dismissal unfair for single refusal to work additional shift at very short notice
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
CASES CITED: Shop Distributive and Allied Employees' Association, New South Wales Vs Librus Pty Limited trading as Dymocks Parramatta [1999] IRC 1062.
HEARING DATES: 03/04/2005 EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 03/04/2005
APPLICANT Mr Alex Temesvari represented himself LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr Fred Alam
DECISION: 17 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: MURPHY C
22 April, 2005.
Matter No IRC 3860 of 2004
ALEX GEORGE TEMESVARI AND DIVINE IMAGE GROUP PTY LIMITED.
Application by Alex George Temesvari re unfair dismissal pursuant to section 84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate