NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION: Stephen Finlay McMartin v Newcastle Wallsend Coal Company Pty Limited & others [2005] NSWIRComm 31
PROSECUTOR: Stephen Finlay McMartin PARTIES: DEFENDANTS: Newcastle Wallsend Coal Company Pty Limited; Oakbridge Pty Limited; Richard Porteous; Phillip Pritchard; Michael Alston; Mark Robinson; Jonathan Romcke; Michael Coffey; Christopher Nicholls; Terence Shacklady.
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 3198 - 3249 of 2000
CORAM: Staunton J
Penalty:
Specific offences found proved with respect to corporate defendants and three natural person defendants - general principles and considerations - additional penalty provisions of s 51A of the Act not applicable - objective seriousness of the offences - reasonable foreseeability - risk of inrush clearly foreseeable as risk to safety - role of DMR a relevant and mitigating factor as to defendants' culpability - overall defendants have adopted significant practices and procedures designed to ensure safety in the workplace - period of time factor not particularly significant in assessing defendants' criminality - offences do not fall within the worst type of offence category - planning, research and assessment offences represent the defendants' greatest culpability - general and specific deterrence applicable to corporate defendants - principle of totality to be applied where common elements established - inextricable integration of corporate defendants in the operation of the mine - respective culpability equal in relation to three categories of offences - no prior convictions for any of the defendants - additional subjective features taken into consideration in determination of penalty - remorse and contrition - penalties imposed on corporate defendants - assessment of culpability of each natural person defendant relative to corporate defendants and generally - subjective features relevant to natural person defendants - finanical circumstances of natural person defendants - penalty imposed on natural person defendants - orders to be made dismissing charges against remaining personal defendants.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate