NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Sanson v Port Macquarie Cinemas T/As Ritz Twin Cinema [2005] NSWIRComm 38
Jamie Sanson PARTIES: Port Macquarie Cinemas Pty Ltd T/As Ritz Twin Cinema
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 3915 of 2003
CORAM: Harrison DP
Application re unfair dismissal - Compensation sought - termination of employment motivated by action of employee - no act or omission by employer to ground constructive dismissal - offer of further employment ignored by applicant. CATCHWORDS: Held - termination not harsh, unreasonable or unjust - relief refused.
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
HEARING DATES: 02/15/2005 EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 02/25/2005
APPLICANT Solicitor Mr I Paul GWM Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Solicitor Mr S Miles Donovan Oates Hannaford
JUDGMENT:
- 6 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES CORAM: HARRISON DP Friday, 25 February, 2005 MATTER NO IRC 3915 OF 2003 JAMIE SANSON AND PORT MACQUARIE CINEMAS PTY LTD T/AS RITZ TWIN CINEMA
Application re unfair dismissal pursuant to section 84 of Industrial Relations Act 1996 EX TEMPORE DECISION [2005] NSWIRComm 38
1 Mr Jamie Sanson ("the applicant") was employed by Port Macquarie Cinemas Pty Ltd trading as Ritz Twin Cinema ("the respondent") as a cinema projectionist pursuant to the Entertainment and Broadcasting Industry - Cinema (State) Award 319 IG 20 ("the award") from 9 December 1996 to 16 June 2003. There is dispute between the parties in respect to the proper classification and payment of wages due. The applicant seeks recovery of an amount of $174,071.80, which is being pursued in separate and distinct proceedings under s 106 of Industrial Relations Act 1996 ("the Act").
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate