NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION: Kennett and anor v Mayrana Pty Ltd and ors & Myong Ho Pak v Mayrana Pty Ltd and anors [2005] NSWIRComm 134
FIRST APPLICANT (IRC03/3679) Keith Franklin Kennett
SECOND APPLICANT(IRC03/3679) K F Kennett Nominees Pty Ltd
APPLIANT (IRC03/3680) Myong Ho Pak
FIRST RESPONDENT PARTIES: Mayrana Pty Ltd
SECOND RESPONDENT Garratts Limited
THIRD RESPONDENT Christopher Campell
FOURTH RESPONDENT Mike Traynor
FILE NUMBER(S): 3679 & 3680 of 2003
CORAM: Marks J
LEGISLATION CITED: Legal Profession Act
HEARING DATES: 04/21/2005 EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 04/21/2005
APPLICANTS Mr A Britt of counsel Solicitor: Mr G H Healy G H Healy & Co, Sydney LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENTS Mr P Kite SC Solicitor: Mr K Pringle Gordon & Johnstone Solicitors
JUDGMENT:
- 1 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: MARKS J
TUESDAY 21 APRIL 2005
Matter No IRC 3679 of 2003
KEITH FRANKLIN KENNETT AND ANOR v MAYRANA PTY LTD AND ORS
Application under s.106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996
Matter No IRC 3680 of 2003
MYONG HO PAK v MAYRANA PTY LTD AND ORS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate