NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION : Inspector Stephen Campell v James Gordon Hitchcock [2003] NSWIRComm 436 PROSECUTOR: WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Stephen Campbell) PARTIES : DEFENDANT: James Gordon Hitchcock FILE NUMBER: IRC 5660 & 5661 of 2001 CORAM: Walton J Vice-President Evidence - Deposition - Witness gave evidence in coronial inquiry into death of deceased - Evidence in coronial proceedings given both as a statement and as a deposition - Evidence tendered under s 112 of the Criminal Procedure Act - Whether evidence given in coronial proceedings a deposition for the purposes of the Criminal Procedure Act - Whether the evidence given in the coronial proceedings was otherwise admissible - Interaction between the Criminal Procedure Act and the Evidence Act - Held the exclusionary provisions of Pt 3.11 of the Evidence Act apply to evidence tendered in reliance upon the facilitative provisions of the Criminal Procedure Act - Held evidence was a deposition for the purposes of the Criminal Procedure Act and was otherwise admissible. CATCHWORDS : Evidence - Operation of Pt 3.11 of the Evidence Act - Assessment of probative value - Whether assessment of reliability is a matter affecting the assessment of probative value - Tension between judgment of Hunt CJ at CL in R v Carusi and McHugh J in Papakosmas considered - Prejudice - Ruling on objections. Crimes Act 1900 s 409(repealed) LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Procedure Act 1986 s 112 and 116 (repealed) Evidence Act 1995 Adam v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 96 Attorney General of New South Wales v Jackson (1906) 3 CLR 730 Domican v The Queen (1992) 173 CLR 555 Festa v The Queen (2001) 208 CLR 593 Gorman v Fitzpatrick (1987) 32 A Crim R 330 Mendham & Foster (1993) 71 A Crim R 382 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297 R v Attard, R v Mifsud [1970] 1 NSWR 750. R v BD (1997) 94 A Crim R 131 R v Blick (2000) 111 A Crim R 326 R v Brotherton (1992) 29 NSWLR 95 R v Carusi (1997) 92 A Crim R 52 R v Duke (1979) 22 SASR 46 R v GK (2001) 53 NSWLR 317 R v Gover (2000) 118 A Crim R 8 CASES CITED : R v Grant (2001) 127 A Crim R 124 R v Le (2002) 54 NSWLR 474 R v Marshall (2000) 113 A Crim R 190 R v Serratore (1999) 48 NSWLR 101 R v Sinanovic (1992) 67 A Crim R 230 R v Singh-Bal (1997) 92 A Crim R 397 R v Stackelroth (1996) 86 A Crim R 438 R v Suteski (2002) 56 NSWLR 182 R v Tugaga (1994) 74 A Crim R 190 R v Yates, Parry, Hyland, Powick [2002] NSWCCA 520 Reg v Burrell [2001] NSWSC 120 Reg v Farquhar (unreported, Court of Criminal Appeal, 29 May 1985) Reg v Lynch [1979] 2 NSWLR 775 Rogers v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 251 Scott v The Queen [1989] 1 AC 1242 Smith v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 650
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate