NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Medical Tribunal
CITATION : HCCC v Allen [2010] NSWMT 8 revised - 13/10/2010 TRIBUNAL: Medical Tribunal PARTIES : Health Care Complaints Commission (Applicant) Dr Richard Allen (Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : 40016 of 2009 CORAM: Staff J - Ng, Dr J - Grimes, Dr D - Smith, Mr RJ CATCHWORDS: PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT - respondent doctor signed a statement knowing that it would be presented to an inquiry conducted by the Medical Board into a practice conducted by another medical practitioner where he was employed - respondent careless and reckless in permitting statement to be relied upon - care exercised significantly below the standard reasonably expected of an experienced medical practitioner - respondent engaged in conduct relating to the practice of medicine in signing statement - conduct improper or unethical - respondent acknowledged misconduct - contrition - Tribunal satisfied misconduct would not be repeated - practice of medicine over lengthy period exemplary - professional misconduct - reprimand. Civil Procedure Act 2005 LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act 1995 Medical Practice Act 1992 Police Act 1990 Health Care Complaints Commission v Karalasingham [2007] NSWCA 267; Health Care Complaints Commission v Litchfield (1997) 41 NSWLR 630; Re Dr Parajuli [2010] NSWMT 3; CASES CITED: Health Care Complaints Commission v Wingate (2007) NSWLR 323; NSW Medical Board v Dinakar [2009] NSWMT 8; Re A Medical Practitioner and the Medical Practice Act 40010/07 3 September 2007 (unreported); Re Dr Richard Wingate [2007] NSWMT 2 DATES OF HEARING: 17 May 2010, 18 May 2010, 19 May 2010 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 2 July 2010 Mr G Farmer of counsel (Applicant) Health Care Complaints Commission LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Ms C Ronalds SC (Respondent) Mr M Fitzgerald solicitor ORDERS: 1. Dr Allen is reprimanded; 2. Dr Allen is to pay the HCCC's costs of these proceedings, on the ordinary basis as defined in s 3 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005; Pursuant to cl 6 of Sch 2 of the Medical Practice Act, the Tribunal has made a non publication order in respect of the name of a patient referred to in the proceedings
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate