NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION : Laird v Commissioner of Police [2001] NSWIRComm 253 APPLICANT: Christoper Laird PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Commissioner of Police FILE NUMBER: 3022 of 2001 CORAM: Grayson DP whether increment deferrment was harsh unreasonable or unjust, whether appropriate sanction, application of Police Service policy, inexperience of applicant, impecable character of applicant, whether adequate weight given to submissions of legal representative, intention of parliament in enacting reviewable sanctions, sanction disproportionate to misconduct, public interest not affected CATCHWORDS : Held, order harsh, unreasonable and unjust, order revoked LEGISLATION CITED : Police Service Act 1990 Telecommunication (Interception) Act 1979 (Cth) Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410 CASES CITED : Wells v Commissioner of Police (2000) 100 IR 106 Van Huisstede v Commissioner of Police (2000) 98 IR 57 HEARING DATES: 08/24/2001; 10/15/2001 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/22/2001
APPLICANT Mr B Docking of counsel instructed by Mr E Oates Oates & Smith Solicitors LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr J Graves of senior counsel instructed by Mr N Ball Court & Legal Services, NSW Police Service
JUDGMENT: - 1 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES Coram: GRAYSON DP Date: 22 October 2001 Matter No. 3022 of 2001 CHRISTOPHER LAIRD v COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate