NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Perks and Petroski and New South Wales Department of Juvenile Justice [2005] NSWIRComm 458
APPLICANT Public Service Association and Professional Officers' Association Amalgamated Union of New South Wales (on behalf of Hayden Perks and Mladen Petroski) PARTIES: RESPONDENT New South Wales Department of Juvenile Justice
FILE NUMBER(S): 3124 and 3220 of 2005
CORAM: Sams DP
Termination of employment - dismissal of two Youth Officers employed in juvenile justice centre - unfair dismissals - allegations of misconduct - incident involving four officers and detainee - annonymous informant - allegations contested - balance of probabilities - past history of detainee - failure to report incident - whether incident involved use of force - failure to report use of force - allegations against detainee - failure to report minor misbehaviour - respondent's policies and procedures - first hand evidence - preliminary interviews - reliance on handwritten notes - notes not provided to applicants - version of interviews contested - procedural unfairness - whether dismissals harsh, unjust or unreasonable - reinstatement sought. CATCHWORDS: Held, applicants' evidence not accepted - other corroborative evidence to be preferred - implausible and improbable explanations by applicants - detainee and officers engaged in an act of horseplay - detainee had not complained - no use of force - no misbehaviour by detainee - no basis to criticise investigation - answers during preliminary investigation more likely to be the truth - applicants less than truthful - conduct of proceedings - duty of fidelity to employment relationship broken - dismissals not harsh, unreasonable or unjust - applications for relief dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate