NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION: Martin Terry v Huge Lights Pty Limited and Others [2005] NSWIRComm 448
APPLICANT: Martin Terry
FIRST RESPONDENT: Huge Lights Pty Limited (ACN 002 638 888) PARTIES: SECOND RESPONDENT: Jonathon Hughes
THIRD RESPONDENT: Michelle Hughes
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 2169 of 2002
CORAM: Schmidt J
Practice and Procedure - notice of motion seeking orders to set aside notices pursuant to section 67 of the Evidence Act 1995 - evidence - section 63 and section 64 of Evidence Act 1995 - hearsay rules - onus not met by respondents - costs CATCHWORDS:
Evidence Act 1995 LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Regulation 2005
Citibank Ltd v Liu, ABN Amro Bank NV v Liu [2003] NSWSC 69 CASES CITED:
HEARING DATES: 12/02/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/02/2005
APPLICANT: Mr B Cross of counsel SOLICITORS: Ronald M Fluit, Solicitor LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENTS: Mr C Biscoe of counsel SOLICITORS: LC Muriniti & Associates
JUDGMENT:
- 1 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES IN COURT SESSION
CORAM: Schmidt J
2 December 2005
Matter No IRC 2169 of 2002
MARTIN TERRY v HUGE LIGHTS PTY LIMITED AND OTHERS
Application under s.106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate