NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION : Finemore AO v Resarta Pty Ltd (No 2) [2002] NSWIRComm 193 APPLICANT Ronald Stanley Finemore AO
RESPONDENTS First Respondent PARTIES : Resarta Pty Limited
Second Respondent Toll (FHL) Limited formerly called Finemore Holdings Limited
Third Respondent Toll Holdings Limited FILE NUMBER: IRC 7532 of 2001 CORAM: Marks J CATCHWORDS : Waiver of privilege - Unfair contract proceedings - Reply filed by respondents alleges improper and unlawful conduct by former directors of two respondent corporations - Applicant wishes to show documentation to three named former directors referring to legal advice given in connection with transactions allegedly involving improper conduct - Held in the circumstances that waiver of privilege should be imputed. LEGISLATION CITED : Industrial Relations Act 1996 s106 Attorney Geneal (NT) v Maurice (1986) 161 CLR 475 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1 Telstra Corporation v B T Australasia (1998) 85 FCR 152 CASES CITED : Hongkong Bank ofAustralia Ltd v Murphy (1993) 2 VR 419 United States v Woodall (1970) 438 (2d) 1317 Southern Equities Corporation Ltd (in liquidation) v Arthur Andersen & Co (unrep. SASC 6373, 23 September 1997) Hardcastle v Advanced Mining Technologies Pty Ltd (2001) FCA 1846 J A Farrow Mortgage Services v Webb 1996) 39 NSWLR 601 at 608-9 HEARING DATES: 07/11/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/14/2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate