NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION : Inspector Mansell v Eleven Lighting Pty Ltd [2002] NSWIRComm 339 PROSECUTOR Inspector Paul Mansell PARTIES : DEFENDANT Eleven Lighting Pty Ltd FILE NUMBER: IRC 4406 of 2001 CORAM: Marks J CATCHWORDS : Occupational health and safety prosecution - Plea of guilty - Defendant submitted that its means to pay a fine should be considered - Application of s 6 Fines Act to corporate defendants - Onus and evidence required - Application rejected - Fine imposed. LEGISLATION CITED : Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983 s 15(1) Fines Act 1996 s 6 Haynes v C I & D Manufacturing (1995) 60 IR 455 Ferguson v Nelmac Pty Ltd (1999) 92 IR 188 Smith v The Queen (1991) 25 NSWLR 1 Cheshire (1994) 76 A CrimR 261 Queen v Belcher (1981) 27 SASR 46 WorkCover Authority of NSW v Taylor (2002) NSWIRComm 9 CASES CITED : WorkCover Authority of NSW v Newstart 150 Pty Ltd (2002) NSWIRComm 64 WorkCover Authority of NSW v Milltech Pty Ltd (2001) NSWIRComm 192 WorkCover Authority of NSW v Yass Shire Council (2000) NSWIRComm 57 Manpac Industries Pty Ltd v WorkCover Authority of NSW (2001) NSWIRComm 190 WorkCover Authority of NSW v Converquip (2001) NSWIRComm 85 R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270 Kaye v Bagg (No 2) (1984) 11 ACrim 127 HEARING DATES: 02/20/2002; 06/26/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/12/2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate