NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Rimmer v Boltt International [2005] NSWIRComm 1158
APPLICANT Matthew Rimmer PARTIES: RESPONDENT Boltt International
FILE NUMBER(S): 2154 of 2005
CORAM: Murphy C
CATCHWORDS: Summary dismissal for alleged attempt to take customers away from employer - procedural fairness issues considered in context of Commission being satisfied that e-mail sent by applicant showed such intent to reasonable person - Commission declined to intervene.
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
Pastrycooks Employees, Biscuit Makers Employees & Flour and Sugar Goods Workers Union (NSW) v Gartrell White (No.3) (1990) 35 35 IR 70 Hungerford J, CASES CITED: Rapp V Wauchope RSL
HEARING DATES: 09/22/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/04/2005
APPLICANT Matthew Rimmer appeared in person LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Phillip Chaney appeared in person
DECISION: - 9 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: MURPHY C
4 November, 2005
Matter No IRC 2154 of 2005
MATTHEW RIMMER AND BOLTT INTERNATIONAL
Application by Matthew Rimmer re unfair dismissal pursuant to section 84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996
DECISION
[2005] NSWIRComm 1158
1 The applicant was employed with the respondent as a sales manager organising commercial shipping freight. His employment was from 11th October, 2002, until his summary dismissal on 8th April, 2005, for alleged breach of fiduciary duty towards his employer.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate