NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION : Cavacuitti & Anor v XTMCA Ltd (Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Pty Ltd) [2002] NSWIRComm 117 FIRST APPLICANT Anthony Andrew Cavacuitti SECOND APPLICANT PARTIES : Berridale Investments Pty Limited
RESPONDENT XTMCA Limited (Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Limited) FILE NUMBER: IRC 666 of 1999 CORAM: Marks J CATCHWORDS : Unfair contract - Held arrangement constituted by a mutual understanding to embark on a course of conduct leading to the grant of a Toyota dealership - Arrangement held unfair in part only by reason of conduct of Toyota - Unfairness did not on the state of the evidence justify the granting of any relief under s 106 - Summons dismissed and costs reserved. LEGISLATION CITED : Industrial Relations Act 1996 CASES CITED : Baker v National Distribution Services Ltd (1993) 50 IR 254
HEARING DATES: 04/08/2002; 04/09/2002; 04/10/2002; 04/11/2002; 04/12/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/05/2002
APPLICANTS Mr J S Van Aalst of counsel SOLICITORS Gates Moffitt
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT SOLICITORS Mr C Barton Freehills
JUDGMENT:
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS OF NEW SOUTH WALES IN COURT SESSION CORAM: MARKS J Wednesday 5 June 2002 Matter No IRC 666 of 1999 ANTHONY ANDREW CAVACUITTI & ANOR v XTMCA LTD (TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION AUSTRALIA LTD).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate