NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Medical Tribunal
CITATION : The Medical Practice Act 1992 re Dr Lam [2005] NSWMT 19 TRIBUNAL: Medical Tribunal PARTIES : Health Care Complaints Commission Dr Chuen (Wallis) Lam FILE NUMBER(S) : 40017 of 2005 CORAM: Sidis, DCJ - Glover, Prof W - Ng, Dr J - Smith, Mr RJ CATCHWORDS: Prescription of steroids without clinical justification - alteration of clinical records - credit Medical Practice Act 1992 - ss 36 and 37 LEGISLATION CITED: Medical Practice Regulation 1998 Poisons and Therapeutic Goods Regulation 1994 Poisons and Therapeutic Goods Act 1966 Richter v Walton NSWCA U/R 15.7.93; HCCC v Litchfield (1997) 41 NSWLR 630; CASES CITED: Bannister v Walton (1993) 30 NSWLR 699; Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; Pillai v Messiter (1989) 16 NSWLR 197 @ 200; Spicer v New South Wales Medical Board and Ors NSWCA U/R 19.2.1981 DATES OF HEARING: 7, 8, 9 March and 11 April 2006 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 7 July 2006 Counsel G B Furness LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Solicitor S Shearman HCCC Counsel P Nematalla Solicitor C Outzen ORDERS: 1 The Tribunal finds Dr Lam guilty of professional misconduct; 2 Dr Lam's name is to be removed from the Register of medical practitioners; 3 No application for review of order 1 is to be made until two years have elapsed from the date upon which order 1 is made; 4 Dr Lam is to pay the costs of the Health Care Complaints Commission, as agreed or assessed; 5 Exhibits may be released
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate