NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION: Thomson and anor v Societe Generale Australia Limited and anor [2005] NSWIRComm 207
FIRST APPLICANT Michael Thomson
SECOND APPLICANT Bengoal Pty Ltd PARTIES: FIRST RESPONDENT Societe Generale Australia Limited
SECOND RESPONDENT Societe Generale
FILE NUMBER(S): 1795 of 2002
CORAM: Marks J
CATCHWORDS: Expert evidence - tender of report rejected because the report did not contain within it material which allowed a conclusion to be reached that the opinions expressed were wholly or substantially based on specialised knowledge.
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
ASIC v Rich [2005] NSWCA 152 CASES CITED: HG v The Queen (1999) 197 CLR 414
HEARING DATES: 05/23/2005; 05/24/2005; 05/25/2005; 05/26/2005; 05/27/2005; 05/30/2005; 05/31/2005; 06/01/2005; 06/02/2005; 06/03/2005; 06/06/2005; 06/07/2005; 06/08/2005; 06/09/2005; 06/10/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/24/2005
APPLICANTS Mr T D Blackburn SC with Mr I W Raine of counsel Solicitors: Mr H Williamson Debney Williamson Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENTS Mr B D Hodgkinson SC with Mr A B Gotting of counsel Solicitor: Mr A G Shanahan Shanahan Tudhope Solicitors
JUDGMENT:
- 4 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES IN COURT SESSION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate