NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION: Raquel Moreno v New South Wales Department of Sport and Recreation; Heather McLean v New South Wales Department of Sport and Recreation [2005] NSWIRComm 310
APPLICANT (IRC 4/2470) Raquel Moreno
APPLICANT (IRC 4/2472) PARTIES: Heather McLean
RESPONDENT New South Wales Department of Sport and Recreation
FILE NUMBER(S): 2470 & 2472 of 2004
CORAM: Marks J
CATCHWORDS: Section 106 proceedings - application to amend summons - new allegations of conduct dating from 1993 - new allegations arguably different to allegations in current summons - no time bar applies - respondent has not demonstrated prejudice - amendment allowed.
Industrial Relations Act 1996 LEGISLATION CITED: New South Wales Protected Disclosure Act 1994
CASES CITED: Howitt & Ors v Retec Ltd & Anor (No. 2) (1995) 60 IR 93
HEARING DATES: 08/24/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/07/2005
APPLICANTS Ms Brus of counsel Solicitor: Michelle Walsh Turner Freeman Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr R deMeyrick of counsel Solicitor: Mr P Rankins Crown Solicitor's Office
JUDGMENT:
- 5 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES IN COURT SESSION
CORAM: Marks J Wednesday 7 September 2005
Matter No IRC 2470 of 2004
RAQUEL MORENO v NEW SOUTH WALES DEPARTMENT OF SPORT AND RECREATION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate