NSW Caselaw
Drug Court of New South Wales
CITATION : R v Rolfe [2001] NSWDRGC 2 Regina PARTIES : -v- ROLFE, Shaine FILE NUMBER(S) : 0046 of 2001 CORAM: His Honour Judge Neil Milson Accused's Antecedents - Discretion - Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW) - Risk if admitted to Drug Court Program :- Whether facts of offence before the court can be considered in exercise of discretion under s7(2) of Drug Court Act 1998 - Whether dangerous driving may constitute violent conduct. Propensity to commit violent offences - Risk to the community CATCHWORDS: Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW) S7(2) - "eligible person" LEGISLATION CITED: Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW) R v Ranse [1999] NSWDRGC 2; CASES CITED: R v Darrant [1999] NSWDRGC 7; R v Ali [2001] NSWDRGC 1 DATES OF HEARING: 12/04/2001 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12 April 2001
Regina - D. Muddle, Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW)
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Offender - H. Grahame, Legal Aid Commission (NSW)
JUDGMENT:
Background
1. The offender seeks entry to the Drug Court, charged with a number of offences, including taking and driving a motor vehicle without the consent of the owner, driving under the influence and driving in a manner dangerous to the public. After reading the allegations I have questioned that is appropriate for him to enter a Drug Court program, and have heard evidence and addresses in that respect.
The Law
2. The decisions to be made involves the court's exercise of its discretion under s 7(2) of the Drug Court Act 1998 . The relevant parts of that section provide "(2) The Drug Court may, under this section, convict and sentence a person who has pleaded guilty to the offence for which the person has been referred (whether before the referring court or the Drug Court) if, and only if , it is satisfied as to each of the following matters: (a) that the person is an eligible person, (b) that, having regard to the person's antecedents, it would be appropriate for the person to participate in a program under this Act, …" 3. That section provides that the Court " may " - (a word which imports a discretion) - "convict and sentence a person if and only if it is satisfied of " a number of factors. However, even if satisfied of those things, there remains a discretion to sentence or not to sentence: R v Ranse [1999] NSWDRGC 2.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate