NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: New South Wales Local Government, Clerical, Administrative, Energy, Airlines & Utilities Union v Newcastle City Council [2005] NSWIRComm 364
New South Wales Local Government, Clerical, Administrative, Energy, Airlines & Utilities Union PARTIES: Newcastle City Council
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 4384 of 2004
CORAM: Harrison DP
Notification under s 130 of a dispute re shift allowances - Parking Station Attendants - claim for payment of shift allowance as two shift workers - award interpretation - s 175 of the Act CATCHWORDS: Held - not two shift workers - day work with late finish allowance in accordance with award - shift allowance refused
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
HEARING DATES: 09/29/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/20/2005
APPLICANT Mr P Collins USU LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr C Radvan Newcastle City Council
JUDGMENT:
- 12 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: HARRISON DP
Thursday, 20 October 2005
Matter No IRC 4384 of 2004
Notification under section 130 by New South Wales Local Government, Clerical, Administrative, Energy, Airlines & Utilities Union of a dispute with Newcastle City Council re shift allowances - Parking Station Attendants
DECISION
[2005] NSWIRComm 364
1 The notification in this matter, filed by New South Wales Local Government, Clerical, Administrative, Energy, Airlines & Utilities Union (USU) on 27 July 2004, advised of a dispute with Newcastle City Council ("the Council") in the following terms: The Newcastle City Council has failed to pay appropriate shift allowances for Parking Station Attendants to employees working a two-shift roster in accordance with the Newcastle City Council Employees Award. Appendix A - Hours of Work of the Newcastle City Council Employees' Award 2003 clause (xii) covers the arrangement of hours to be worked by Parking Station Employees and the allowances to be paid. The Union contends that the Council have not made payment in accordance with this clause. 2 The matter was subject to compulsory conference proceedings on 30 July 2004 which established that the dispute was not capable of resolution by conciliation. A Certificate of Attempted Conciliation was issued and the matter stood over pending filing of evidence by the USU. 3 The matter was subject to mention on 20 May 2005 at which time directions were issued to bring the matter to hearing, which took place on 29 September 2005. 4 Mr Collins, appearing on behalf of the USU, tendered Draft Orders sought (Ex 2) in the following terms: 1. These proceedings have been initiated by a Dispute Notification pursuant to Section 130 of the Industrial Relations Act (hereafter "Act"). Conciliation has to date failed and the matter is proceeding to Arbitration.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate