NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION : Veta Limited v Evans [2004] NSWIRComm 336 APPELLANTS: Veta Limited (a company incorporated in Hong Kong) Cathay Pacific Airways Limited
RESPONDENTS: Mark Andrew Evans PARTIES : David Michael Honner Brett Kenneth Rosewall David Bruce Spong Charles Bruce Burton
INTERVENOR: Attorney General of New South Wales FILE NUMBER: IRC 4423 of 2004 CORAM: Wright J President; Walton J Vice-President; Kavanagh J CATCHWORDS : Appeal - Unfair contract - Challenge in the High Court to Court Session's jurisdiction remitted by High Court pursuant to s 44 of the Judiciary Act to be heard by Court Session - Case management - Power and discretion of judge to order that original s 106 proceedings and remitted proceedings be heard together - Power of State court to hear judicial and non-judicial proceedings together - Whether r 82 of the Industrial Relations Commission Rules provides right to the applicant under that rule to have jurisdictional issue determined prior to other issues - Leave to appeal granted - Appeal dismissed. Australian Constitution s 75 Bankruptcy Act 1924-1933 (Cth) s 217 LEGISLATION CITED : Industrial Relations Act 1996 s 106 s 179 Industrial Relations Commission Rules 1996 r 76 r 82 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39 s 44 Baker v The Queen (2004) 210 ALR 1 Caltex Petroleum Pty Limited v Harmer (1999) 92 IR 264 Cell Tech Communications Pty Ltd v Nokia Mobile Phones (UK) Limited & Ors (1995) 58 FCR 365 Cram, Ex parte Newcastle Wallsend Coal Co Pty Ltd, Re (1987) 163 CLR 140 Dingjan, ex parte Wagner, Re (1995) 183 CLR 323 Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 46 FLR 409 Euphoric Pty Limited v Ryledar Pty Limited (2002) 117 IR 1 Evans and others v Veta Ltd and Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd [2004] NSWIRComm 203 Fardon v Attorney-General for the State of Queensland (2004) 210 ALR 50 Hyde v Energy Australia (1999) 92 IR 409 Kable v The Director of Public Prosecutions for the State of New South Wales (1996) 189 CLR 51 CASES CITED : Knowles v Anglican Church Property Trust (No 2) (1999) 95 IR 380 Metrocall Inc v Electronic Tracking Systems Pty Limited (No 2) (2000) 102 IR 309 Mullins v Peoplebank Australia Pty Limited [2003] NSWIRComm 457 Nagle (T/as W D and J L Nagle & Sons) v Tilburg (1993) 51 IR 8 National Australia Bank Ltd v Cassino [2002] NSWIRComm 241 R v Kirby, ex parte Boilermakers' Society of Australia (1956) 94 CLR 254 R v The Federal Court of Bankruptcy, Ex parte Lowenstein (1938) 59 CLR 556 Taudevin v Egis Consulting Australia Pty Limited (2000) 97 IR 165 Taudevin v Egis Consulting Australia Pty Limited (No 1) (2001) 131 IR 124, [2001] NSWIRComm 340 Taudevin v Egis Consulting Australia Pty Limited (No 2) (2002) 131 IR 178 Verso Technologies Inc v Rasmussen [2004] NSWIRComm 90 Wilson v Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs (1996) 189 CLR 1 HEARING DATES: 10/18/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/15/2004
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate