NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION : McRann v UnitedGlobalcom Inc and ors [2003] NSWIRComm 131 APPLICANT/RESPONDENT ON THE MOTION Robert McRann
FIRST RESPONDENT/FIRST APPLICANT ON THE MOTION United Globalcom Inc
SECOND RESPONDENT/SECOND APPLICANT ON THE MOTION UIH Asia/Pacific Communications, Inc.
PARTIES : THIRD RESPONDENT/THIRD APPLICANT ON THE MOTION Austar United Communications Limited
FOURTH RESPONDENT/FOURTH APPLICANT ON THE MOTION Austar Entertainment Pty Limited
FIFTH RESPONDENT/FIFTH APPLICANT ON THE MOTION CTV Pty Limited
SIXTH RESPONDENT/SIXTH APPLICANT ON THE MOTION STV Pty Limited FILE NUMBER: 3104 of 2001 CORAM: Peterson J CATCHWORDS : Unfair contract claim - Interlocutory motion by respondents to dismiss proceedings before hearing - Applicant and first respondent citizens of USA - Applicant as employee of first respondent seconded to work in Australia as Managing Director of Australian affiliates of first respondent - US litigation pending - Questions of jurisdiction - Whether contract "in and of New South Wales" - Questions of issue of estoppel - Whether deed of release operates as an estoppel - Whether motion premature - Motion denied on all grounds. LEGISLATION CITED : Industrial Relations Act 1996 Interpretation Act 1987 Nagle (t/as W D & J L Nagle & Sons) v Tilburg (1993) 51 IR 8 Western Sydney Area Health Service v Gibson (2001) 109 IR 359 Reich v Client Server Professionals of Australia Pty Ltd (2000) 49 NSWLR 551 McGurk v ECC Lighting Ltd [1996] NSWIRComm 159, 30 August 1996, unreported. Thoday v Thoday [1964] P 181 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Limited (1981) 147 CLR 589 Hoyts Pty Ltd v Spencer (1919) 27 CLR 133 Mayburry v Atlantic Union Oil Co Ltd (1953) 89 CLR 507 CASES CITED : Kish v V G Haulage (1971) AR 956 Bartolacci v Permanent Custodians Ltd (1992) 44 IR 388 David Jones Limited v Cukeric (1997) 78 IR 430 Chrysler Jeep v Canberra Star Motors (1997) 79 IR 452 Origin Energy Limited v Smith (NSW) [2001] NSWIRComm308 Kosta Tszyu v Fight Vision Pty Ltd (2001) 104 IR 225 Grant v John Grant & Sons Pty Limited (1954) 91 CLR 112 Regie National des Usines Renault SA v Zhang (2002) 187 ALR 1 OJEH Pty Ltd and ors v Primus Telecommunication Pty Ltd [2001] NSWIRComm 27
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate