NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION : Tyndall and Ibnix Limited [2001] NSWIRComm 111 APPLICANT PARTIES : Troy Patrick Tyndall RESPONDENT Ibnix Limited FILE NUMBER: 5243 of 2000 CORAM: Sams DP Costs in unfair dismissal proceedings - s181(2)(c) of the Act - unreasonable refusal to settle claim - conduct of the parties - discretion of Commission. CATCHWORDS : Held, respondent's conduct unreasonable - respondent refused to reasonably settle claim - costs ordered. LEGISLATION CITED : Industrial Relations Act 1996 Legal Profession Act 1987 Bankstown City Council v Paris, 93 IR 209 CASES CITED : Copperart v Martin, 68 IR 58 Blagojevch v Australian Industrial Relations Commission, 98 IR 32 HEARING DATES: 04/05/2001; 04/25/2001; 05/02/2001 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/25/2001
APPLICANT Mr E Peterson of Counsel Solicitor LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr M Corrigan RESPONDENT No appearance
JUDGMENT: - 10 - MINDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM : SAMS DP
25 May 2001
Matter IRC00/5243
TROY PATRICK TYNDALL AND IBNIX LIMITED
Application by Troy Patrick Tyndall re unfair dismissal pursuant to section 84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996
DECISION AS TO COSTS
1 In a decision published on 12 March 2001 the Commission, as presently constituted, reinstated the applicant, Mr Troy Tyndall, on certain terms to his former position employed by Ibnix Limited ("the respondent"). Relevantly, the decision ordered that any application for costs be filed within twenty-one days.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate